Monday, December 31, 2007

Auld Lang Zion 2008


Should auld accomplice be forgot,
And never brought to trial?
Should auld Osloids, friend, be forgot,
In days of auld lang Zion?

For betraying auld lang Zion, my dear,
For debasing auld lang Zion.
Should their accomplice be forgot,
In days of auld lang Zion?

We yids hae run aboot the world,
Under fire all the time.
We've wandered mony a weary foot,
To reach auld lang Zion.

Save auld lang Zion, my dear,
Save auld lang Zion,
Indict those Oslo blaggards, dear,
For the sake of auld lang Zion!

Thursday, December 27, 2007

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com

"It is unthinkable in an American context that the Supreme Court should insert itself at will into the decisions of the political or military establishment, and micromanage government and security. Cases take years to get to the Supreme Court, so American judges already have real-life experience as to what works, what doesn’t work and what real harm is caused, if any. " - Rabbi Steven Pruzansky with a glimpse into Judicial Oligarchy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------"Candidates of both parties are falling over themselves to tell us how wonderful they are. They are quick to point out the shortcomings of the other side. From “family de-values” to drugs to essays written in kindergarten to being too Christian to not being Christian enough to opposing a war they voted for to flip-flopping on immigration, abortion or what their favorite baseball team is – this motley crew of candidates has done little to convince this writer that any of them is particularly honest." - Rabbi Yerachmiel Seplowitz and a Tale of Two Kings.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"What is surprising is the chief rabbinate’s involvement in such a scheme. Practically speaking, the political ramifications are obvious: like its ideological parent, a “religious UN” would be rabidly anti-Israel and use its power and prestige to further undermine the Jewish hold on the land. The theological and spiritual ramifications, however, are even more serious. " - Torah from Norway, Truth from the Land of Israel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Egyptians have no such compunctions. Responding to Congressional pressure, Mubarak last month dispatched a contingent of Egyptians generals to Capitol Hill. There they claimed that the Israeli military is responsible for the weapons shipments to Gaza. The generals alleged that Israeli soldiers actively assist the smugglers who transfer the weapons to Hamas from the sea." - Caroline Glick and the Egyptian problem.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In our home there is a very different atmosphere than the one of tension, stress and discord that surrounded his bar mitzvah. I see him trying to process and accept that life here with us is different. He loves his brother and looks forward to the events planned in celebration of his bar mitzvah, but he cannot help but feel a bit resentful that he did not have the same positive experience and good memories about his own bar mitzvah." - Yehudit Levinson on the joys of a Blended Family.


Finally, exclusively in our print edition (available at newsstands or by calling 718-992-1600 ext. 344: Blessings of Closure, Amazing Serach, and Sports Plus.
Happy Reading!

Worst of Times

Pictured: Frank Rich, smugly liberal New York Times columnist.
Tis the season for end-of-year lists, and the invaluable TimesWatch website has issued its annual roundup of dozens of biased or just plain silly quotes from the reporters, columnists and editors who work so hard to ensure that The New York Times maintains its august position as the flagship publication of the Democratic National Committee.

Your unassuming correspondent was honored when asked by TimesWatch director Clay Waters to be one of three judges whose task it would be to read through the many gruesome entries Mr. Waters had compiled and then select one as the absolute worst of the lot. Each of the judges ended up choosing a different quote.

The three choices for Worst Quote appear below, along with a couple of others your trusty scribbler/judge came close to choosing. For the full list of nominated quotes, click here -
and be sure to visit TimesWatch regularly during 2008 as the presidential campaign heats up and the Times skews its coverage to help the Democrats before endorsing the eventual Democratic nominee for the 13th straight presidential election.

● Thomas Lifson, editor and publisher of
The American Thinker, chose this, from a May 6 article by reporter Elaine Sciolino on the French election, which would result in a win for right-of-center Nicolas Sarkozy:

“While Ms. Royal has pledged to protect and unite France, Mr. Sarkozy has often taken a ruthless us-against-them attitude, stressing there is no place in France for young people who do not respect the law or for immigrants who do not embrace French values….In this election, authority apparently is deemed to be more important than compassion.”

● Donald Luskin, publisher of the blog
The Conspiracy to Keep You Poor and Stupid tapped this ode to wealth redistribution from economics reporter turned editorial board member Eduardo Porter in a Nov. 12 signed editorial:
“More broadly, if the object of public policy is to maximize society’s well-being, more attention should be placed on fostering social interactions and less on accumulating wealth. If growing incomes are not increasing happiness, perhaps we should tax incomes more to force us to devote less time and energy to the endeavor and focus instead on the more satisfying pursuit of leisure.”

● Your enterprising scrivener chose this comment by the odious Frank Rich in his Oct. 14 column about how Americans who fail to see their republic morphing into the Fourth Reich resemble the “good Germans” of the 1930’s and 40’s – a statement that perfectly encapsulates the Times’s weltanschauung:

“Our humanity has been compromised by those who use Gestapo tactics in our war. The longer we stand idly by while they do so, the more we resemble those ‘good Germans’ who professed ignorance of their own Gestapo…. It’s up to us to wake up our somnambulant Congress to challenge administration policy every day. Let the war’s last supporters filibuster all night if they want to. There is nothing left to lose except whatever remains of our country’s good name.”

Your humble scribe almost picked this Nov. 11 hallucination from Rich, who apparently writes his column when his attendants take him out of his rubber room for a little morning exercise:

“This is a signal difference from the Vietnam era, and not necessarily for the better. During that unpopular war, disaffected Americans took to the streets and sometimes broke laws in an angry assault on American governmental institutions. The Bush years have brought an even more effective assault on those institutions from within. While the public has not erupted in riots, the executive branch has subverted the rule of law in often secretive increments. The results amount to a quiet coup, ultimately more insidious than a blatant putsch like General Musharraf’s.”

And then there was this, from reporter-columnist Jim Dwyer’s May 30 piece on the conspiracy-mongering entertainer Rosie O’Donnell, who isn’t sure we know who really was responsible for 9/11:

“The first day of the post-Rosie O’Donnell era on ‘The View’ television show has come and gone, and by any fair accounting, an often useful provocateur has left the building. In her final months on the air … she opened debates with others about terrorism, peace and citizenship…. Few civic virtues are as useful as skepticism, though it is rarely honored until too late. The citizens who questioned the validity of the case for war in Iraq were widely scorned or ignored in 2002 and 2003 by the government and the news media.”

Calling Their Bluff

Massive anti-Israel rallies fueled by pro-Palestinian Islamic rabble rousers in the Galilee and Arab Knesset members are one big bluff. When push comes to shove, Israeli Arabs, especially the Druse, want no part of being "Palestinian."

This past week, an Israeli polling organization conducted a survey of more than 500 Israeli Arabs. When asked if they preferred to be citizens of Israel or residents of a Palestinian Authority-controlled entity, 62% of Israeli Arabs admitted they would rather be "Israelis." Among the Druse that figure jumped to 84%!

Life has been good for many Israeli Arabs. A substantial number of men are gainfully employed as builders and suppliers, while many of their children go to top schools, including Haifa U. and the Technion. A few years ago, I was invited to the home of a well-known Israeli Arab builder in the Northern Sharon region. His home was actually a mini-palace with with a large indoor swimming pool. I sincerely doubt he would make the same kind of money from his Arab brethren across the border in the Palestinian Authority. And since many Israeli Arabs don't pay real taxes (they work on a cash-only basis), you can see many families spending as much money in Tel Aviv or Haifa malls as their Jewish neighbors.

Are they, as they claim, discriminated against by the secular Ashkenazi government in Jerusalem? No, they're not. And just consider how the government of Israel treats its own people, including downtrodden Sephardic Jews in Sderot and Ethiopian Jews across the country.
Israel is actually one continuous episode of "Survivor." The Israeli Arab Knesset members who push their anti-Semitic, allegedly pro-Palestinian agenda are the true racist clowns in the propaganda wars. When they're finished antagonizing the Jews at the end of the day, they head back to their upscale homes, where their lifestyle has absolutely nothing in common with their Palestinian brethren.

The time has indeed come for Jewish politicians such as Avigdor Lieberman (Israel Beitenu) and Aryeh Eldad (Ichud Leumi-Tikvah) to push for a mandate that would force Israeli Arab Knesset members to vow allegiance to the Jewish state. Either that or pass a law that would lower the number of Israeli Arab representatives allowed in parliament. They shouldn't be able to curse and undermine our existence and get paid $100,000 a year for the privilege!

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

A Jewish Perspective on Christmas

In the appendix to a terrific book published by Urim Publications, Rabbi Dr. Leo Adler (who served as the rabbi of the Jewish community in past-war Basel, Switzerland, and died in 1978) offers an intelligent and intellectual explanation as to why he can’t submit “a Jewish interpretation of Christmas” to a Christian journal. Here is the letter with the editor’s background as it appears in the book, The Biblical View of Man:

[In 1966, Father Theodor Bogler OSB, the editor of a Christian journal, Liturgie und Mönchtum, asked Rabbi Adler to contribute a Jewish interpretation of Christmas to the journal’s holiday edition. His refusal, which was published with his permission in Liturgie und Mönchtum 39 (1966) 96-97, and which is translated below, exemplifies both his own understanding of the present volume, on the one hand, and his urbanity, on the other.]

Jewish Community of Basel
May 31, 1966

Most honored Father,
I thank you for your friendly letter of May 21 and the invitation to contribute to the Christmas edition of Liturgie und Mönchtum a piece on the Jewish attitude to the Christian festival of Christmas. Although I very much appreciate your friendly offer, I must reject it. If, as you write, you heard of me through my booklet Der Mensch in der Sicht der Bibel, then if you reread the chapter on “The Transformed View of Man in Apocryphal Literature” you will understand that the idea of a God who reaches out to man, turning himself into man and flesh so as to reach man because man can no longer manage to reach God and, indeed, was very in his history capable of doing so – that this idea is of apocryphal origin and is diametrically opposed to ancient biblical traditional of man being equipped with freedom and, thereby, with the strength and righteousness needed to find his way along the path to God.

Accordingly, the Christian interpretation of the Christmas festival is an impossible notion for Jewish theology, not only a question of a religion’s attitude. Notwithstanding all the moral and ethical commonalities, which result both from Christianity’s Jewish origin and from recent renewed Christian attention to the ancient Bible, we must not lose sight of that which divides us – which is nowhere more obvious than in connection with the Christmas festival, which for professing Christians has not only a symbolic meaning, but also a religious reality of the highest order.

Far be it from me, therefore, to oppose the certainty of Christian belief with that of Jewish belief, something which anyway would do you no service.

So I would ask you to leave it at that, with no other alternative in a situation in which each of us perceives God and seeks his own share in Him in his own way.

Yours, with friendly regards,
Rabbi Leo Adler

Monday, December 24, 2007

A Kosher Outrage

So some Israeli parents are enraged because the Ministry of Education has recently mandated that students' trips to the concentration camps in Poland be totally kosher. It seems that up until now the food wasn't kosher. And now that it will be, the price will go up. By how much? Parents say a few hundred dollars, the ministry says tens of dollars.

I am not surprised that some parents are upset at the additional cost - kosher is not an issue for them. Sort of like the woman who sent a letter to McDonald's that she will no longer eat at their restaurants because there wasn't a menora on display for Chanukah. She obviously has no clue.

I guess these parents don't either, but that someone at the Ministry of Education didn't see the importance of making these types of trips into one steeped in Judaism is beyond sad.

But why am I surprised at anything the Israeli government does?

Teacher's Pet? Not In Israel!

One would think that after the recent two month long teacher's strike, Israeli students would be hungry for a bit of knowledge. Think again. Israeli students, you know... the ones who used to have parents who cared and were amongst the world's best in math, history etc? Well, they've decided to get stupid, thanks to the corrosive effects of the internet.

According to a recent international survey, conducted amongst junior high and high school students in Eastern & Western Europe, 6th and 8th grade students in Israel ranked #1 in the "who hates going to school?" category. And not surprising, the same 6th and 8th graders ranked #1 in the "who surfs the most on the internet?" category. And they were ranked #2 and #3 in "TV couch-potato usage." category. The Bulgarians in 6th, 8th and 10th grades were ranked #1 in the world when it comes to watching TV.

Not surprisngly, Israel's 6th, 8th and 10th graders did NOT consider themselves as "being under pressure to study hard"--as they ranked #32, #23, and #11 amongst other countries in taht category. Slovenian and Polish students were ranked as the #1 students in the world, who felt pressured to "learn."

Though the Israeli media claims that a solid majority of Israeli teens hate living in the Jewish State and wouldn't mind taking a hike, the international survey found that Israeli youngsters in the 6th, 8th and 10th grades were ranked near the top in terms of "being satisfied with their daily lives."

Imagine how much more satisfied they would be, if they could actually add, subtract and know where they live?

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Agunah rally in Flatbush

There was a demonstration today for an agunah (a woman whose husband refuses to give a get). There were over a 100 people protesting at the house. What is interesting is that it wasn't at the husband's house, but at the house of a rabbi who is advising him to hold out. I was wondering if anyone knows why he is refusing. There are no children involved. Is there more to the story?

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Maariv Takes on the "Fascist Left"


This past Friday was something of a milestone.

For the first time a mainstream Israeli journalist referred to the radical Left as the "Fascist Left."

Let me explain. First, Israeli Hebrew journalism is by and large the occupied territory of the Israeli Far Left, and under its hegemony. (The electronic media are not much better.) Haaretz is somewhat to the Left of the communist party, routinely runs Op-Eds calling for Israel's annihilation, and the Haaretz idea of "journalistic pluralism" makes Pravda under Brezhnev look like a fountain of democratic enlightenment. Yediot Ahronot is not as extreme as Haaretz, but is almost as homogeneously and uniformly Left. Maariv is the only Hebrew daily with any semblance of pluralism and even it is more Left than Right. Nevertheless, one can find on its pages Nadav Haetzni, by far the best columnist in Israel, and he is well to the Right, plus some others who refuse to toe the political correctness line.

Maariv also is quite willing to bash the Left for its anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism and Maariv editors do not spare ammo when it comes to shooting at the "Post-Zionists" and the "New Historians." The most militant of the Maariv bashers of the anti-Israel Israeli Left are Ben-Dror Yemini and Prof. Amnon Rubinstein, both of them left of center but strongly pro-Israel and Zionists.

In his column on Friday, Yemini (whose family came from Yemen) denounces a "conference" held in Spain under the official auspices of the Spanish government, in which only leftists were invited, to search for "peace solutions" to the Middle East conflict. Except admission to the conference was reserved mainly for those who endorsed the "Palestinian Right of Return" and also who endorse the replacement of Israel by a "bi-national state," meaning a Rwandan-style country in which the Arab majority would quickly eliminate the "problem" of the Jewish minority in a new Final Solution. Israeli and Palestinian leftists, who found the ground rules of the "debate" acceptable, participated. See this. The conference was largely the initiative of one Ofer Bronstein, an Israeli leftist who is currently promoting the division of Jerusalem but used to organize pilgrimages of leftist "rabbis" to kiss Arafat's -- er -- hand. Bornstein is associated with the anti-Israel extremist and ex-Nazi Uri Avnery.

Yemini wonders why the media refer to such an atrocity as a "peace conference." I just say DUH. Yemini also thinks there exists an insane Left and a sane Left, and in the latter he includes "Peace Now." I do not agree that there exists a sane Left. Yemini thinks there exists a "war between Lefts." I think there exists a war by the Left against Jews.

Be that as it may, Yemini concludes, "The battle against the fascist Left is not yet lost…. Not that the fascist Left will disappear any time soon."

I do not share his optimism. But it really made my week that a serious respectable mainstream journalist in Israel is willing to declare that the Leftist Emperor is Naked, and the anti-Israel Left is nothing more than a Fascist Left.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Giants of Journalism


The Media Research Center is out with its annual “Best Notable Quotables” awards for the most biased – or just plain idiotic – statements, observations and questions to come out of the mouths of media people in the 12-month period from December 2006 through November 2007.
For the complete list by category, as well as the Quote of the Year, visit http://www.mrc.org/.
Meanwhile, here a few of the Monitor’s favorites:
● “When doctors pronounced the Rev. Jerry Laymon Falwell Sr. dead at 12:40 p.m. EST Tuesday....my first thoughts were not of what to say or write. In fact, my very first thought upon hearing of the Rev. Falwell’s passing was: Good. And I didn’t mean ‘good’ in a oh-good-he’s-gone-home-to-be-with-the-Lord kind of way. I meant ‘good’ as in ‘Ding-dong, the witch is dead.’”
– Chicago Sun-Times columnist Cathleen Falsani in her May 18 piece, “Sigh of relief over Falwell death.”

● “You could argue that even the world’s worst fascist dictators at least meant well. They honestly thought [they] were doing good things for their countries by suppressing blacks/eliminating Jews/eradicating free enterprise/repressing individual thought/killing off rivals/invading neighbors, etc....Bush set a new precedent. He came into office with the attitude of ‘I’m so tired of the public good. What about my good? What about my rich friends’ good?’”
– Ex-Washington Post sports reporter and “Seinfeld” writer Peter Mehlman in a June 20 Huffington Post blog item.

● Co-host Harry Smith: “President Bush getting ready to go to Europe for the G-8. The folks in the European Union want to do emissions reductions. The president said yesterday we’re not going to participate....If you were president, you would have probably signed on?”
Former Vice President Al Gore: “Yeah, yeah.”
Smith: “Do you mind if I-? [holds up a ‘Gore 2008’ pin]...There you go. You can hold it. [laughter]....Here, let’s see what it looks like. [holds pin to Gore’s lapel]...All right, all right. Save that in a freeze frame.”
– Exchange on CBS’s “The Early Show,” May 30.

● CNN’s Larry King: “Are you sorry about that [“60 Minutes” National Guard story] now?”
Ex-CBS anchor Dan Rather: “No.”
King: “You think the report was correct?”
Rather: “Yes. And I think most people know by now that it was correct.”
– Exchange on CNN’s “Larry King Live,” September 20.

● Co-host Diane Sawyer: “A number of people have already said, ‘Is there anything surprising, personal about [Iranian] President [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad that we didn’t know?’ Well, it turns out, someone told me he cries a lot. That he is dramatically sentimental and sympathetic if someone comes up and expresses a personal plight. So I just asked him, are you often in tears?”
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: “Yes, that’s true. Not only for Iranians, of course, they are very close to me and I love all Iranians. And anywhere, when I see people suffering, I have the same reaction....Even when I see on TV that, for example, some Americans, because of tornadoes or a hurricane, they have lost their homes, I become sad.”
– ABC’s “Good Morning America,” February 13.

● Co-host Joy Behar: “One thing is that Giuliani post-9/11 appeared to be very heroic. But now they’re saying that he was not that efficient in helping the people who were the recovery people, the responders.”
Rosie O’Donnell: “Also he was, you know, instrumental in making sure that all of the steel was removed and shipped to Canada right away, Giuliani – was shipped to China, sorry, right away.”
Behar: “For what purpose?”
O’Donnell: “Well, to get it out of there and to have, you know, all of the stu – but it was all gone. So there was no, like, metal to test.”
– Exchange on ABC’s “The View,” May 14.

● “Al Qaeda really hurt us, but not as much as Rupert Murdoch has hurt us, particularly in the case of Fox News. Fox News is worse than Al Qaeda – worse for our society. It’s as dangerous as the Ku Klux Klan ever was.”
MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann in an interview with Playboy magazine, October issue.

● “You know, I wanted to sit on a jury once and I was taken off the jury. And the judge said to me, ‘Can, you know, can you tell the truth and be fair?’ And I said, ‘That’s what journalists do.’ And everybody in the courtroom laughed. It was the most hurtful moment I think I’ve ever had.”
– Co-host Diane Sawyer joking on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” July 12.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

The Reform Movement’s Push for Shabbos, Sort Of

The head of the Reform movement, Rabbi Eric Yoffie, has called for an increase in Sabbath observance among Reform Jews—bringing back Shabbos, if you will. But not quite the Shabbos we know and cherish. “It will mean... approaching Shabbat with the creativity that has always distinguished Reform Judaism,” the Jerusalem Post quoted Yoffie as saying in a speech at the movement’s convention (given last Saturday, ironically). “It will mean emphasizing the ‘Thou shalts’ of Shabbat candles and Kiddush, rest and study, prayer and community—rather than the ‘Thou shalt nots.’”

Is the Reform push for Shabbos a positive or negative development? I think we should support any return to observance by our Jewish brothers and sisters. Even a tiny, uneven step can help move one in the right direction. Isn’t that what we would say to a prospective ba’al teshuvah at our Shabbos table?

But it’s so very unfortunate that the Reform movement fails to understand the beauty of Shabbos just as G-d made it, the way the proscriptions free us from our weekday preoccupations and make room, psychologically speaking, for the holiness that the prescriptions bring.

In the same address, Yoffie urged every temple to institute a study program about Islam to further Jewish-Muslim understanding. Such a curriculum would no doubt glorify Islam and whitewash its hostile messages. Sadly, if Yoffie succeeds, Reform Jews will end up knowing more about Islam than they do about Judaism.

Meanwhile, Shimon Peres recently promised to keep a single Shabbos, in response to a request by France’s chief rabbi. I’m not sure if he actually did it, but his pledge to do so sounded more like a publicity move to me. He even invited Muslims and Christians to join in the ritual. The only direction Peres is moving (besides hopefully toward retirement) is toward the nearest television camera. But who knows…there has to be a pintele yid in there somewhere.

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com

"As the conflict with Israel hardened throughout the 1950’s, Nasser came to see that Palestinian nationalism, if carefully manipulated, could be an asset instead of just a threat and an annoyance. But Nasser’s ability to support such a useful terrorist group was limited by the failed economy over which he presided; and so, in 1964, he was delighted to cooperate with the Soviet Union in the creation of the Palestine Liberation Organization." David Meir-Levi and the Propaganda War.
**************************************************
"I never understood the argument that someone who does not live in Eretz Yisrael has no right to differ with the policies of the democratically elected government there.
I know of no Americans who have ever urged Israel to follow a particular policy that was not also supported by some segment of the Israeli population, including elected members of the Knesset. How can it be OK for an Israeli to say something but wrong for us to say the very same thing?" -
A conversational exchange on a controversial topic.
*****************************************************************
"And through the plaintive chanting of the Ein Kelokeinu prayer and the other prayers he led that day, he sent a message, too, to Jews everywhere, that the Jewish people would live again, that the Nazi regime of genocide – and the world of hate, slavery, and murder it created – would be trampled underfoot." - A prayer service in Nazi Germany
*****************************************************************
"Many years ago, while flipping through a newspaper looking for the comics, I came across the obit page. Most were a few lines, so when I saw a rather lengthy piece, I glanced at it out of curiosity. It started with the words, “eighteen years after being given six months to live, the family sadly announces the passing of...” It went on to say how this man in his upper 40’s, having far exceeded medical expectations, had outlived some of his doctors. Obviously, this man did not allow the “experts” dictate to him what his future would be. Despite the “facts on the ground” he fought – just like the Maccabees." - Cheryl Kupfer and the Miracle of Trying.
******************************************************************
"Bronx Community College professor of history David Gordon agreed: 'They pay far too much attention to radical causes that are dear to the far left but much less attention to the economic needs of the membership.”' - CUNY Professors and an anti-American union.

Plus, Ma'alot Halhul, Challenge of Leadership and A Daughter's Remembrance,

Finally, exclusively in our print edition (available at newsstands or by calling 718-992-1600 ext. 344: Erica's Tale, Powerful Melodies, and Boozy Pears.



Happy Reading!

Saturday, December 15, 2007

The Persecution of David Ohana by Ben Gurion University


AH, Ben Gurion University (BGU). The Bir Zeit of the Negev. The school in which turning out leftist NewSpeak counts as "research" and "scholarship" and where one can get tenure for mass producing anti-Israel hate propaganda The university that has never initiated any disciplinary actions against Neve Gordon, Oren Yiftachel, Lev Grinberg, or its legions of campus fulltime anti-Israel propagandists, even when they are involved in criminality.

But Ben Gurion University has long had it in for writer and Moroccan-born historian David Ohana. Left of center, Ohana – who teaches in the Jewish history department at Ben Gurion University – has been accused of sexual harassment by five women (including secretaries and cleaning staff) at the university. They said he had said graphic things to them about sex. One said he gave her a kiss.

Except the facts were not so clear. A number of faculty members at BGU came out in SUPPORT of Ohana, signing a petition demanding he NOT be disciplined, many claiming he was being harassed by the women because one of them had had a work conflict with Ohana about something unrelated to sex.

BGU is so politically correct and intolerant of political incorrectness that it is hard to believe that any of its professors would stick their necks out to defend someone accused of harassing women unless they were convinced he was truly innocent. Sexual harassment on most PC campuses is a modern-day Inquisition, where the faculty member is guilty until he can be proven innocent, and faculty members are well aware of the perils of even being accused. (This is not to make light of ACTUAL sexual harassment on campus, just pointing out that false accusations of such can be used maliciously and vindictively to ruin careers.)

While most professors at BGU taking a stand on the matter BACKED Ohana, a minority, led by Neve Gordon and some radical feminists, demanded Ohana's head. Remember, this is the same university in which the only non-Lefist member of the political science department was fired for refusing to stick to the official anti-Israel political line there! Ohana in Haaretz accused his campus accusers of "political persecution" (June 29, 2006).

Meanwhile, the BGU disciplinary committee chewed on the case for more than 6 months, unsure of what to make of all the evidence. Obviously, it was hardly cut and dry against Ohana. Numerous faculty members testified in Ohana's behalf.

Eventually the disciplinary committee (on October 10, 2007), which consisted of three professors (two of them women), found Ohana INNOCENT! They said that in some cases the accusations were simply false, the women accusing Ohana deemed liars by the judges, while in others they thought Ohana deserved the benefit of the doubt. That meant the judges did not approve of some of his behavior but saw insufficient evidence against him to convict him of harassment.

Naturally the political correctness stromtroopers at BGU and elsewhere hit the ceiling. The very same people who spent months demanding that Far-Leftist Haim "Divide-Jerusalem-Now" Ramon be cleared and returned to his nice warm cabinet seat after HE was convicted in a real court of law for sexual harassment were outraged that David Ohana was being allowed to walk with his head still attached.

So a few days after he was cleared, Ohana was "convicted" by his campus crusaders of "unbecoming conduct," meaning exercising his freedom of speech in a manner that included some expressions of poor taste. Both the President and Rector of BGU, people who long endorsed Neve Gordon's attempt to use the Israeli court system to suppress freedom of speech, backed the "conviction" of Ohana.

This past week, Haaretz reported that the same BGU campus authorities that did nothing when Neve Gordon was arrested for interfering with the IDF's anti-terror operations have decided to dock Ohana of three months pay. This for being INNOCENT of sexual harassment!! They also issued a strong reprimand of him that will effectively prevent him forever from holding senior campus administrative or leadership positions.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com

"'In hindsight it appears that bombing Iraq was the obvious thing to do because it was successful. But try to look at it through the eyes of Ezer Weizman or Yigal Yadin or Yosef Burg in 1981 when they had to make a decision. They said, "Look, we just signed a peace treaty with Egypt, and in the end the Arabs will have a nuclear bomb anyway, you can’t stop it forever, and they know we have one so if they try to do something they’ll be wiped off the map. So why bomb Iraq? What do you expect Israel to do, go after every country that has an atomic bomb and bomb it?'" - an interview with Ze'ev Raz about the day sun stood still.
**************************************************************************
"After undergoing surgery in Hadassah Hospital during the Six-Day War, Zaida returned home weak and weary, in need of healing. My husband promised him that if he ate, and gained strength, he would take him to the newly liberated Kotel. It was a real incentive, and after two months, on Rosh Chodesh Elul, Sholom brought the car to the apartment my grandfather was now sharing with my parents in Rechavia, on the edge of Shaarei Chesed, and drove Zaida straight up to the Wall.
The sound of the shofar, unheard at the holy site for so many years, filled the air at the Kotel that morning. Zaida’s tears of joy – tears for having been deemed worthy to daven, to seek forgiveness, and to praise Hashem at the Kotel – have yet to dry up. They linger on, with much vividness, in my memory."
Faigie Heiman with a tribute to her Zaida's spirit.
*******************************************************************************
"We recall Olmert’s own adjuration that every Jew is obligated to speak out regarding Jerusalem’s fate because “Jerusalem is not only the city of those who live in Jerusalem, it’s not only the city of those who live in the State of Israel – it is the city of every Jewish person no matter where he lives.” - Jeff Ballabon on why Jerusalem belongs to all Jews.
*****************************************************************************
"It seems that all of the Annapolis participants, including the leaders of the Israeli government, agreed from the onset that these 300,000 Jews living in Eretz Yisrael are residents of an occupied foreign entity. This precondition had to be established in order to realize the “united vision” of a terrorist Palestinian state whose “democratic” system will not allow any Jews to live there. Do the Americans and Europeans really believe that a secure peace for the Middle East can result from the creation of a terrorist state that won’t allow Jews to enter?" - Rabbi Eliezer Waldman with the Jewish response.
************************************************************************
Plus, the Jewish Legal Claim , Building a World of chesed, and Off-Season Musings



Finally, exclusively in our print edition (available at newsstands or by calling 718-992-1600 ext. 344) Lessons In Emunah, Teens and Twenties and Pesach travel advertising.

Happy Reading!

Horrid Generation

Dennis Prager, the sometimes controversial, always thought-provoking radio host and syndicated columnist, wrote a column last week on the legacy the baby boom generation has bequeathed to younger Americans.

“We live in the age of group apologies,” wrote Prager. “I would like to add one. The baby boomer generation needs to apologize to America, especially its young generation, for many sins.”

One of those sins, according to Prager, is the mindless pacifism espoused by Sixties-era liberals and leftists and passed down to their ideological heirs – a pacifism neatly summarized by the popular 1960’s slogan “Make love, not war.”

“Our parents,” Prager continued, “had liberated the world from immeasurably cruel and murderous regimes in Germany and Japan – solely thanks to waging war. But instead of concluding that war could do great moral good, we sang ourselves silly with such inane lyrics as ‘Give peace a chance,’ as if that deals in any way with the world’s most monstrous evils. So we taught you to make love and not war. And we succeeded.”

The column struck a chord because this writer has long viewed baby boomers as the most overindulged, overrated, self-infatuated and self-destructive generation America has produced to date. (Full disclosure: this writer is also very much a part of that horrid generation.)

Many things about the boomers merit disdain, perhaps none more than the baseless claim – repeated so often it’s been virtually inscribed as historical fact – that antiwar boomers basically shut down the Vietnam War.

Of course, even if one accepts the premise that the antiwar movement ended America’s involvement in Vietnam, the fact is that most of the more intelligent opponents of that war, and certainly just about all of those with the means and influence to do something about it – elected officials, journalists, financial contributors to political parties – were born well before 1946, the start of the baby boom era.

But the reality is that antiwar activists – of whatever age – were in no way responsible for ending the war.

All the major public opinion polls of that era, from the first stirrings of antiwar sentiment in 1965 to the mass demonstrations four and five years later, showed that the majority of Americans remained more or less supportive of their government’s policy in Southeast Asia.

The peace candidate Eugene McCarthy’s near victory in the 1968 New Hampshire primary was fueled in great measure by voters who felt the Johnson administration was not being aggressive enough in its prosecution of the war.

Many of those McCarthy voters actually went on to support the third-party candidacy of the Vietnam hawk George Wallace in the November general election.

As late as 1972 – a full eight years after the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, four years after the Tet offensive, three years after revelation of the My Lai massacre and two years after the National Guard shootings at Kent State – the Democratic presidential nominee, George McGovern, running on an unambiguous vow to stop the war, suffered a loss of cataclysmic proportions to President Richard Nixon.

By then, of course, the antiwar movement itself had largely petered out as the Nixon administration implemented a series of troop withdrawals and the draft gave way to an all-volunteer armed forces.

Rather than give credit to the antiwar movement for stopping the war, it’s at least as valid to suggest that the turmoil created by the movement served further to paralyze U.S. policy makers, whose aims in Vietnam were never very clear to begin with.

After all, the war in Vietnam, at least in terms of Americans fighting and dying, lasted three times as long as the Korean conflict of the 1950’s – a war that, by way of comparison, elicited minimal backlash on the home front.

Speaking of the baby boom generation, former “NBC Nightly News” anchor Tom Brokaw is out with a new book, Boom!, a follow-up of sorts to his mega-seller The Greatest Generation, which chronicled a generation that, unlike its boomer offspring, actually did end a war, defeating Germany and Japan in World War II.

Boom! makes for interesting reading, but for a more substantial – and sobering – look at boomers and what they wrought, see Peter Collier and David Horowitz’s Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties.

Buddy, Can You Spare a Shekel?

Unemployment levels may be at their lowest levels in years in Israel , but would you believe that as the number of unemployed citizens decreases the number of people needing food packages and other forms of assistance from private charitable organizations is actually increasing?Welcome to the wonders of the Israeli economy.

According to one of the country's largest outreach organizations, nearly 30% of the population is asking for help with the weekly grocery list, as more and more middle class families are gainfully employed but cannot properly feed themselves.

Last week, the government released its monthly economic report. Though the price of gasoline and foodstuffs continues to rise, the average Israeli income fell by nearly 2.5% to 7,800 shekels or about $2,000 a month ($500 a week). Restaurant workers, farmers, teachers and construction workers made substantially less. Is it any wonder why high school teachers went out on strike for nearly a month a half?

So let's say the husband is a schoolteacher earning 6,100 shekels a month, while his wife works at a restaurant as a cook or waitress, adding 3,100 shekels to the monthly budget. Between paying the mortgage, utility bills, insurance, gasoline/insurance for the car, monthly food bills and basic bills for two schoolchildren (public school, not private), there would be virtually no financial reserves for clothing or many other things we take for granted -- movies, vacations, etc.

And let's not forget that city, state, water and social security taxes eat away between 40-45% of earned income. Israeli citizens are among the highest taxed people in the Western world.

It's bad enough that the government refuses to provide "human" assistance to many indigent Holocaust survivors and new immigrants from poor countries who are living in utter misery. But now the working middle class has to quietly ask charitable organizations for food because the government refuses to force the business community to act equitably toward fellow Jews.

Should a 25-year employee at one of Israel's largest conglomerates be forced to cry in front of a TV journalist as he reveals that his employers who rake in huge profits have failed to give him a raise after 25 years of dutiful service?

The Land of Milk and Honey is being milked by those who refuse to share the honey with their employees. Is it any wonder that nearly 500,000 expatriate Israelis lived legally and illegally across North America?

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Norman Finkelstein exiled to Coney Island

To right - Norman Finkelstein doing research on how the Holocaust never took place for his Iranian friends, at Coney Island.


A hilarious article on the demise of Neo-Nazi Norman Finkelstein in New York Magazine, here.

Note how he claims the Jews are "crucifying" him!

Sunday, December 9, 2007

A Belated Thanksgiving Thought

A post on http://guesswhoscoming2dinner.blogspot.com inspired me to repost an article I wrote last year.

Many are the reasons religious Jews offer for celebrating or not celebrating Thanksgiving.

The least rational of the lot, however, has to be the often snidely delivered boast: "Orthodox Jews thank God every day."

First, I doubt that more than a handful of American Jews truly thank God every day for the free and benevolent country they live in.

Leaving that aside, however, I wonder how these Jews come to to terms with holidays like Chanukah, which only comprises eight distinct days every year. By golly, don't we thank God every day for the miracles He performed for our Maccabean ancestors? How could the rabbis have established such a holiday?

How could they have established only one day a year to thank God for the salvation from Haman's genocidal decree? Shouldn't we thank God every day for this miracle?

Why did God reserve only seven days to commemorate the exodus from Egypt? How come only one day to celebrate the giving of His Torah? Why only one day a week to remember God's creation of the world?

The fact is that human beings and religions have always designated certain times and days for reflection and celebration. Children are glad their parents married each other but only congratulate them on their anniversary. They are sad when their parents pass on but especially call their memory to mind on the date of their death.

Almost all of religion and culture centers around specific physical symbols or temporal times designed to evoke certain ideas or emotions.

So, to those Jews opposed to celebrating Thanksgiving I say: Offer any argument you please to support your position. But please, please do not assume some sort of moral superiority by saying you thank God every day for America. You unwillingly criticize your own religion (and your adherence to it) by doing so.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

The Vegetarian Jihad and the Jews

IS there anyone more obnoxious than a militant and self-righteous vegetarian?

Oh, you know the type I mean: an animal rights radical who tells you that you are a murderer if you eat pastrami; a vegan afraid that cutting down a carrot will make the plant sad; someone who thinks YOUR choice for lunch is HIS business! Actually in Temple times, vegetarianism was downright prohibited one evening a year (evening of Passover), and the Shulkhan Arukh says that meat should be eaten on festivals and sabbath to make them more joyous.

My favorite example was a few years back on the Left Coast, where a group of radicals called themselves "JIHAD", as in, Justice through Insurrection by Humans for Animal Defense, had taken root.

No, I am not making this up! Don't believe me; do a Nexis search.

The Jihadniks were upset at the Carl's Jr. fast food chain. It seems Carl's had been running ads for its greasy burgers as part of its "Eat Meat" campaign, which dissed the vegetarians. "The vegetarians will get over it," taunted one ad. "Don't let them make you feel guilty, ok?"

The Jihadniks took all this as a personal affront, although -- as someone who keeps kosher -- I cannot see how the ads are any more offensive to the Jihadniks than to us, which is to say - not at all.

Meanwhile, in a later twist on this, Los Angeles area Islamic groups, including the Orange County Islamic Society, led by Haitham Bundaki, were upset with the use of the term "jihad" by the animal rights nuts. "Jihad," they insisted, is a term that should be reserved only for the random murder of Jewish children, not for animal rights wackiness.

Now there has long been a connection between animal rights fruitcakery and the Jews. Consider some statements by animal rights activists as reported by Michael Fumento, the science policy expert at the American Enterprise Institute: When somebody asked the group leader about using animals for medical research she replied, (and I'm not making this up, either) "Well, it's our belief that people shouldn't get sick, in which case there would be no need for animal testing." In another statement reported by Fumento, from Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder and vice-president of People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the largest animal-rights organization quipped: "A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy," and so, it thus follows, "Medical research is immoral even if it's essential. Even if animal testing produced a cure for AIDS, we'd be against it." And best of all: "Six million people died in concentration camps," she told the Washington Post, "but six billion broiler chickens will die this year in slaughterhouses." A counter-PETA group is now operating on the internet, also calling itself PETA, but this counter-PETA stands for "People for Eating Tasty Animals."

Some green movements around the world have been associated with anti-Semitism. Two leaders of the Italian greens were in Israel during the Gulf War and blessed and approved of Saddam's shooting Scuds at Israel, even though it is known that a number of trees were killed by the missiles.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com

"Every war has its chain of command. Soldiers may detest a general, but the consequences can be lethal if they choose not to listen to authority. Calls for massive protests against possible Israeli decisions, no matter how compelling, have to be seen against this backdrop. The stakes are not Israel’s borders, but its existence." Rabbi Broyde and Rabbi Adlerstein with thoughts for After Annapolis.
--------------------------------------------------------------
"What is most compelling here is that paganism has historically been a tolerant, inclusive religious system. Polytheism by its very nature accepts that presence of other religious ideas and forces. Upon no other group did Antiochus impose such religious limitations. Clearly, he perceived that most Jews would continue to stubbornly resist any attempts at Hellenization." Rabbi Naphtali Heff on what it means to be Hero.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Far from being a Jewish version of “goodwill toward men” or any other trendy contemporary cause, the original story of Chanukah is about something very different: the refusal of Jews to bow down to the idols of the popular culture of their day, and to remain resolutely separate and faithful to their own traditions." Jonathan S. Tobin and a Green Chanukah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The key words here are “to make them forget Your Torah and violate the decrees of Your will.” The Chanukah story is not about battling acculturated Jews or rejecting philosophy that is consistent with, but not native to, the Torah. It is about clinging to Torah and mitzvos, and rebelling against an oppressive regime that sought to force us to abandon our religion. The Hellenists passed laws forbidding Jews from observing our religion and, for that reason, we fought back and with God’s help defeated them." Rabbi Gil Student helps us understand Hellenism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There were three reasons for this change. (1) The pagan Roman religion observed Sunday as a day of rest. (2) Many of those in the Roman civil service and the military followed Mithraism. Members of this religion worshiped the Persian god Mithra and also observed Sunday as a day of rest. (3) Finally, Christians were motivated to change the Sabbath day to Sunday in order to distance themselves from the Jews." - Take a Glimpse into the Sunday Laws.

Also the continuing story of Salek, liking who you are & Yaakov and Maariv.

Finally, exclusively in our print edition (available at newsstands or by calling 718-992-1600 ext. 344) Keeping it Simple, Latkes for Yehuda, and I"m Yirtzeh Hashem by You.

Happy Reading and a Chag Chanukah sameach!

A Book for Metsaholics

Of the writing of baseball books there is no end. Of the writing of good baseball books there is not nearly enough. For every The Glory of Their Times or Ball Four or The Boys of Summer or Baseball’s Great Experiment, there are hundreds and hundreds of instantly forgettable hack jobs, clip jobs and ghost jobs.

So as a baseball fan – and more important, a Mets fan – it was with much pleasure that I recently devoured a book by Dana Brand, a professor of English and American literature at Hofstra University, titled, with perfect appropriateness, Mets Fan (McFarland & Company).

It’s a slim (201 pages including the index), soft-covered volume with a hardcover price ($29.95) – and it’s the best exploration yet written about what it means to be a Mets fan, about the all too many lowlights and all too few highlights of Mets history, and about the profound emotional and psychological differences between Mets fans and Yankees fans.

Some selections to savor on a cold winter day and, if you’re a fan of baseball and fine writing, to whet your appetite for the rest of the book:

“There is no good reason why I should care about the New York Mets,” writes Brand in his first chapter. “Like all baseball teams, they are a business. I should care no more about their success than I care about the success of a movie studio or television network. Yet I choose to care, deeply and powerfully. I have cared about the Mets for 45 years and probably will for the rest of my life. I enjoy my loyalty. I enjoy the irrationality and intensity of my loyalty.”

Of the “Meet the Mets” theme song Brand writes, “It is so sweet and so tacky. So Mets. This isn’t a song with which you charge to the top of the standings, or celebrate triumph or a glorious tradition. It is not a song for champions. They must have figured this when they wrote it. You can hear in the song an understanding that an expansion team in 1962 could not get away with taking itself too seriously. It would need to get by on charm. It could not compel your respect or admiration. It would just have to be nice and a little corny. You would come and meet the Mets the way you would come and meet a nutty neighbor who put out a bowl of pretzels and a bottle of soda on a coaster on a table with too many magazines. You knew the line about ‘knocking those home runs over the wall’ was, well, not true.”

Here’s Brand on that strange breed of fan who claims to like both of New York City’s big league baseball teams:

“You can’t root for both the Mets and the Yankees because each team offers a different portal into the pleasure of baseball. If you want what the Yankees will give you, it doesn’t make sense to root for the Mets. They’re failures, no fun. In order to root for the Mets, you have to renounce any desire you have for the monotony of dominance. You have to think it’s absurd to get excited about, or have your heart broken by, a team that has won so many times. You have to cherish triumph because it is unexpected and rare. When John Sterling screams ‘The Yankees win! The YAAANNNNNKKEEEESS WIN!!!!!!’ you have to enjoy the contempt you feel for the idiocy of his exuberance.”

Brand’s take on Ed Kranepool, a Met for 18 seasons, longer than any other player and a symbol of lovable futility: “Eddie didn’t do anything like he was supposed to. He was like a grouchy robot that a kid can’t get to operate…. So the Yankees had Mickey Mantle and Roger Maris and we had Eddie Kranepool. How come theirs worked and ours didn’t? Ours even had a weird name…. He never became a power hitter. He was an okay first baseman. One year he hit .280 and then there was a year when after all the smoke cleared, there was a .323 next to his name and no one could figure out how it got there…. Eddie was more the Mets than anyone else. He was a beloved disappointment. An incompetent who became indispensable.”

Finally, Brand plumbs the psyche of Mets fans: “The pleasure of being a Mets fan is that hitting the jackpot still feels the way it should. You hope. You lose. You lose some more. And someday you win. And you remember the pleasure of winning all your life…. I hope the Mets never become like the Yankees. I want my baseball to be like real life, seasoned with failure and disappointment, ennobled by hope, and studded with just a few spectacular moments of pure joy.”

Speechless

An advertisement for HDTV featuring chassidim singing and dancing to the Village People's "YMCA." I'm not sure what to say. View it for yourself.

Chanukah and the Struggle Against National Suicide

Of all the Jewish holidays, the one that best captures the contemporary Jewish Zeitgeist, the one that is the most relevant to the current and possibly the last chapter in Jewish history, is Chanukah. Chanukah is of course the story of Jewish national liberation. It is the story of the military victory of the few against the many, of the champions of Judaism against the pagan barbarians. But more than this, it is the saga of the heroic struggle of Jewish survivalists (those you would today label "Zionists") against the assimilationists and self-hating Hellenists of the second century BCE. Chanukah is less about the battle against the Greeks than it is about the battle against the predominant assimilationist paradigm at the time amongst the Jews. It is about the battle against the anti-survivalists, those who hated themselves for being Jews and so sought to be progressive and modern and "in" by rejecting and disgracing and degrading themselves in their struggling AGAINST Jewish survival. In other words, it is about the battle against the Oslo of Chanukah Past.

At this stage in Jewish history a convergence has occurred between the main Diaspora Jewish community (in the U.S.) and the Jews of Israel. It is a convergence toward self-destruction, self-abasement, and self-elimination. While it takes different forms, in both cases it is about Jews who are embarrassed because of their being associated and identified as such by the barbarians. They are ashamed of themselves and seek to gain acceptance in the Greek world by overtaking the anti-Semites in attacking their own people. They grovel before the enemies of their people. They demand that their people abandon their archaic and backward religion and traditions and values.

History books will recall the second half of the twentieth century as that era in which the Jews lost their will to survive, first in the Diaspora and now in Israel. Whether or not Jewish history ends in the next decade or so depends on the unlikely proposition that the small numbers of Maccabees still fighting against Hellenism will triumph. They appear to be losing this war. It is not 200 BCE. One should not take a miraculous intervention for granted.

In the United States, the dominance of the Jewish Hellenists is in the form of the assimilationist liberals. These are the Jewish leaders and organizations who dominate the non-Orthodox segments of American Jewry and promote the view that all of Judaism can be reduced to the pursuing of this week's liberal political fads. They practice the "Political Liberalism as Judaism" form of Hellenistic paganism. They reduce all of Jewishness to support for the "progressive" agenda of the left wing of the Democrat Party. They even endorse all forms of politically correct wackiness - from radical feminism to extremist environmentalism to affirmative apartheid. They will only support Israel as long as it is pursuing self-destruction, lest it embarrass them in front of their progressive gentile friends by defending itself.

In Israel, the country's politics - particularly its cultural/educational elite and its chattering classes - are now almost entirely dominated by those motivated by the desire to commit national suicide. These are people who are ashamed of their country and of their own people. They scorn themselves the same way that the Hellenized Jews did at the time of the Maccabees. Like the Hellenized Jews, they are convinced that traditionalist Jews are reactionary and primitive, and that the greatest priority is renunciation of Jewish peculiarity and the striving to assimilate amongst the cosmopolitan progressive Greeks of the world. They insist that a Seleucid "narrative" should replace their own reactionary provincial national one.

Israel's universities are by and large the Occupied Territories of these Jewish Hellenists; the same holds true, almost to the same extent, for the Israeli media. Jewish Hellenists dominate the Israeli military and intelligence services. Hellenists are rewriting the school curriculum to teach Israeli-Jewish children to despise themselves. Their message is that Jews must feel ashamed because they are evil and immoral people, while the truly superior sensitive people are the barbarian anti-Semites. The aim of these Hellenists is to convince the Jews that the only way they may become accepted in the world is to conform to paganism, to turn the Temple Mount over to the barbarians, to stop seeking to exist as an archaic separate national entity, to commit national suicide.

Moreover, their campaign is aimed at challenging the moral existence of the Jews. They realize this is the weakest chink in Jewish armor. If Jews can be convinced that they are morally in the wrong, then no Maccabees will arise. The aim of the Hellenists is the delegitimization of the Jews as a nation, discrediting the moral position of Jewish survivalism. They insist over and over that Jews are evil, immoral, selfish people, who must cease to exist as Jews if they want peace.

The message of the contemporary Hellenists is unambiguous: Those who wish to purify the Temple, who seek pure oil for the Temple lamp, who wish to evict the barbarians from Jerusalem, are the enemies of peace. The Maccabees must be arrested for incitement. The Jews must provide Antiochus with concessions and arms and funds. Under no circumstances should the Jews seek to defend themselves from the Seleucids, for there is no military solution to the terror. If the barbarians murder the Jews it is because the Jews are selfish people and because they have been too reluctant to abandon their primitive survivalism.

The era of national separateness is over; all must join in the great Hellenistic politically correct pagan enterprise. The Post-Hasmonean era is upon us.

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Green Chanukah

A group of Israeli environmentalists is encouraging Jews around the world to light at least one less candle this Hanukka to help the environment

The science here is that each candle produces 15 grams of carbon dioxide - bad for the environment. This might be a case of environmentalist wackos producing too much carbon dioxide.

Perhaps we should power our menorahs with solar power or wind farms, to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Chanukah Twist-Off

As fellow bloggers and others commence the annual bemoaning of Chanukah's ever-growing commercialism, I've been thinking about another angle:

Some holidays come with a built-in requirement -- be it religious or cultural -- to purchase new items every year. So, on Sukkot each year we buy a new lulav and etrog, and on Purim we buy new shaloch manot (and perhaps costumes for the kids).

And Chanukah, too, has long had its new gifts. But we seem to have reached the point where, thanks to those ubiquitous prepared oil cup sets, lighting menorahs will now require a new purchase every year. (Though wax candle lighters have always had to buy their mitzvah anew every year, never at the price of $25.99.)

Is this development good or bad? Well, anything that will help more people fulfill mitzvot can't be bad. But I wonder if we aren't losing something by reducing our candle-lighting setup to simply cracking open or twisting off and voila -- oil ready to be lit. Personally, I prefer to get a little oily.

8 Days of Chanukah...8 Things To Change In Israel

Walking around the holy streets of Bnei Brak earlier this week I was doing my usual observing of Jews from all walks of life, as they busily shopped for a variety of Chanukah items. I couldn't help but wonder how things would be if Jews in Eretz Hakodesh would pray to the Almighty for a set of contemporary Chanukah miracles that could shed light on some of the darkness that hovers over the Holy Land.

Here is my list of solutions to 8 problems we currently face in Eretz Yisrael -- all achievable with a bit of help from the Almighty:
1-Replace the contemporary Hellenistic agenda pervading the government of PM Ehud Olmert with a nationalist-religious political agenda, which would kindle a proud new era for the Jewish state.
2-Reignite the minds and souls of Israeli children victimized by the mindless Education Ministry (which is responsible for the lack of education and discipline in the classroom).
3-Have the government put a spark back into the lives of tens of thousands of Holocaust survivors, who have been victimized by government corruption, by increasing their monthly benefits so they can feel human again.
4-Force the business establishment to pay fair wages to its loyal workers so they can actually afford to buy proper Chanukah gifts for their families.
5-Remove from the Knesset the darkness of the 10 Arab Knesset members who refuse to recognize the Jewish state and offer them parallel jobs in the Palestinian Parliament either in Ramallah or Gaza.
6-Remove from the Knesset the darkness of any Jewish member who wishes to negotiate the end of Jewish sovereignty on the Temple Mount and Jerusalem.
7-Miraculously transform Kassam projectiles hurled by Hamas terrorists at Sderot and the W. Negev into beautiful "Chanukah candles" screaming harmlessly across the skies.
8-Unite Am Yisrael in a common cause to reignite the pintele Yid among the millions of unaffiliated Jews in the U.S. who have lost their spiritual connection to the Holy Land.

Chag Urim Samayach!!!!!

PPPSSSTTT! Pass it on!


PPPSSSTTT! Pass it on! Shulamit Aloni has a Teddy Bear named
Mohammed!