Sunday, September 28, 2008

Deafening Silence

Silence has reigned in the three weeks since the New York Post reported that a male professor, Jay Ladin, returned to Yeshiva University's Stern campus this semester as a woman. (He/She heads the Writing Center.)

When YU's Albert Einstein College of Medicine allowed a gay club on campus in 1995, 24 YU roshei yeshiva publicly protested. Even former YU president, Rabbi Dr. Lamm, publicly stated "I cannot and do not condone homosexual behavior."

Not this time around. A disturbed man/woman is walking on a Yeshiva University campus with close to a thousand Jewish girls (most of whom are Orthodox) and hardly a peep of protest.

Worse. President Joel did not wish to talk to the New York Post but did offer one comment: "I'm proud of my university and all my faculty."

All his faculty? Including, presumably, Ladin? Why did he have to say that? Why couldn't he have offered a comment similar to Rabbi Lamm's 13 years earlier? Why couldn't he have said that he strongly disagrees with Ladin's metamorphosis but that the law is tying his hands?

Almost the entire New York Post article, from beginning to end, is a tremendous chillul Hashem. Towards the article's end, we read this from Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality: "I think it's fabulous and wonderful. I don't know of any other religiously conservative university that employs someone trans."

Great. So YU is the trailblazer. The first. What a great distinction. Not Notre Dame. Not Jerry Falwell's Liberty University. No, Yeshiva University, an Orthodox Jewish institution.

I write not out of hatred. I happen to like YU and love what it stands for -- which is why I find this story so disturbing.

"But what can YU do?" many ask. "If it fires Ladin, it stands to lose government money or be sued." I have two answers: First, so what? One cannot compromise one's principles ad infinitum. First the gay club at Einstein. Then six years later (after a court battle) a lesbian couple is provided with university housing (also at Einstein). And now this transgender saga at Stern. What next? Perhaps RIETS will ordain a gay student. The notion sounds absurd but almost anything is possible if one allows government money, not principles, to dictate school policy.

Some people may counter that allowing a transgender professor on campus is not sin enough to forgo the many benefits of government money.

Perhaps. I'm not sure. But at the very least, YU should put up a fight. Join forces with social conservatives and religious Christians and make this a battle in America's culture wars. Go on TV and talk radio. Galvanize the public. How can a great country like the United States, founded on religious principles, practically force an institution to keep in its employment someone whose very person represents values antithetical to religion?

Even should YU lose, at least it will have registered its strident protest. To accept this moral travesty in silence is simply a sin.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

The Invitation that Wasn't

In its lead editorial, The Jewish Press expresses the concern most members of our community must feel over the disrespect shown by major Jewish organizations to vice presidential nominee Governer Sarah Palin.

The Ahmadinejad/Clinton Outrage
"Something very important happened during the run-up to Monday’s anti-Ahmadinejad rally and it behooves the Jewish community to pay close attention. The already infamous decision by rally organizers to rescind the invitation to Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee – a decision apparently made under extreme pressure from Senator Hillary Clinton, the Obama campaign and some Jewish Democratic groups – marked the end of the time-honored tradition of bipartisanship on the issue of Israel.

That those who torpedoed Gov. Palin’s appearance let politics get in the way of demonstrating across-the-board opposition to someone who regularly and publicly calls for the destruction of Israel is as shocking as it is unacceptable.

Various reasons have been advanced for Sen. Clinton's reneging on her long-standing commitment to participate. She said she felt disrespected by the rally's sponsors for their having failed to notify her, after she’d agreed to participate, that Gov. Palin had also been invited to speak. As a corollary, she added that the Palin invitation turned the event into one of a partisan nature. This is both bizarre and puzzling, since on the one hand she suggests she would not have changed her mind about attending had she been properly apprised of Gov. Palin’s invitation and on the other she implies she would have withdrawn no matter how she found out.

At any rate, it is hard to understand how inviting a Republican vice-presidential candidate to appear together with a U.S. senator closely identified with the Democratic presidential campaign could be anything but bipartisan. The real problem seems to have been Sen. Clinton’s reluctance to share a stage with the hottest personality on the political scene.

Unfortunately for Sen. Clinton, she comes out of this looking like a small-minded operator concerned more about politics than principle. And after having put to rest the ill feelings generated by her notorious embrace of Suha Arafat several years back, she has now reignited all the old questions about her by allowing petty political maneuvering to trump an issue as central to Israel and the Jewish community – and the United States, for that matter – as the ambitions of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, not only the world’s most outspoken anti-Semite but a man determined to acquire nuclear weapons for Iran and use them against Israel.

Seizing upon this opening, diehard supporters of Barack Obama who are central to the financial upkeep of many Jewish organizations mounted a full-court press to force the rally's sponsors to dump Gov. Palin and accept no prominent Democratic substitute for Sen. Clinton. "No Palin, No Way" became the war cry.

Threats were made that unless Gov. Palin were dropped, complaints would be lodged with the Internal Revenue Service against the organizational participants for allegedly promoting partisan political activity in violation of their status as tax-exempt charities. There were also threats about ending financial support to the organizations.

To widespread dismay, the rally sponsors, after a vote of the organizations involved, withdrew their invitation to Gov. Palin. The George Soros-funded advocacy group J Street issued a public statement boasting, "We did it."

Organizational sponsors of the rally such as the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and New York’s Jewish Community Relations Council had from the beginning intended a bipartisan denunciation of Mr. Ahmadinejad; instead they were forced to publicly insult Gov. Palin, who had jumped at the opportunity to express her solidarity with the Jewish community.

It may not be of much interest to the Soros crowd, but mesirah is not the Jewish way of doing things, and the threat of concocting stories to tax authorities is a damnable tactic. Also, the famous Talmudic account (Gittin 55b-56a) of the mistaken identity episode involving Kamtza and Bar Kamtza (the lesson of which is that one must be mindful of the possibly tragic consequences of selfish and unnecessary slights to others) comes to mind.

Jerusalem was destroyed, the Talmud says, after the innocent Bar Kamtza, who had received an invitation to a reception intended for Kamtza, was humiliatingly ejected from the affair by the haughty and unfeeling host."

Comments and Opinions here

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com


Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Red Light In Jerusalem


Are you familiar with the expression, "The lights are on, but no one's home?"

3 P.M. Monday -- Jaffa Road. As I walked down along the street during the mid-afternoon, I had the strangest feeling that something was awry. Usually, as I head down Jaffa towards the Clal Building, and then on to King David Street, just outside the Old City, I usually see an array of security personnel, local police, Border Guards etc., doing their daily patrols. At 3P.M. on Monday, the streets of Jerusalem were virtually empty of security personnel. Flat out weird, I thought. Maybe, I was just tired from the late September heat and long walk.

4:15PM -- As I passed by both Kikar Zion (Ben Yehuda St.) and nearby King David Street, I noticed that there were many groups of young teenage yeshiva girls making their way to the Old City to pray at the Kotel during Elul. This is an annual routine for many state religious schools, who wish to provide their students with a bit of "on location chizuk" during the days leading up to Rosh Hashana. Again, no visible sign of security personnel, anywhere.

When I arrived home at 7 P.M., my wife informed me that our oldest daughter had gone to the kotel with her class and would be home by 10. At 10p.m. our daughter called to tell us that the principal was in no rush to return to Modiin, as he wanted to stay and sing some Psalms to the Almighty with his students. At that point, I began to get antsy. Young teenage girls (and boys) need to daven, yes, but Jerusalem these days is not a place to "hang around."

At 11:25p.m. my daughter called to say she was almost home, but had I heard about the "pigua" (terror attack) that occurred just as the school bus left Jerusalem. It seems that Monday's attempted roadkill terror attack took place just a few hundred yards from where the students were milling about after davening at the Kotel.
As I arrived to pick-up my daughter, I could see dozens of teenage girls hugging each other, some with tears in their eyes, as they realized that they had just missed being traumatized by a vicious terror event.
With all due respect to the rudderless government of Israel, the Israel Police department and school principals everywhere across the Jewish State, isn't it about time to stop promoting the folly of, "Hakol b'seder, we have everything under control." As politically incorrect as it may sound, it's time to put a curfew on East Jerusalem and start confiscating the "blue" Israeli identity cards from East Jerusalem Arabs, many of whom should be deported to Hamastan in Gaza.

Monday, September 22, 2008

About those Open Liberal Tolerant Democratic Ultra-Secularists


A very interesting article appeared a few days ago on the NFC news web site, in Hebrew only - alas, by Alon Dahan, a very interesting Israeli writer. In Hebrew it appears here.

Let me give you a synopsis in English. Dahan begins by relating how a teacher of his in Israel from the former Soviet Union told him of a candle lighting Jewish underground in the darker days of communism, where the students would gather secretly to light Shabbat/Sabbath candles. After the fall of communism his teacher returned for visits to Russia with a yarmulka on his head and lit candles proudly and openly there without fear.

Dahan then jumps to a scene in Jerusalem. In the mainly secular, well-off Jerusalem neighborhood of Beit Hakerem Mrs. M., who is an active Chabadnik (member of the Lubavitcher Hassidic movement) shows up on Fridays, setting up a table in front of the local high school and hands out free Sabbath candles to any students or others wishing to take them.

The school and neighborhood are well known for their reputation for being tolerant and pro-pluralism. Last week the parents of the children in this well-off pluralistic democratic tolerant school called in the cops to have Mrs. M arrested for distributing Sabbath candles. They feared that some innocent young student might be duped by her into going home and suggesting to her family that they light Sabbath candles. The tolerant democratic parents denounced Mrs. M, as a “missionary” who was ladling our political and theological indoctrination. They claimed Mrs. M’s activities threatened the neutral democratic tolerant atmosphere in their tolerant liberal democratic school.

A few days earlier representatives of Nir Baraket, who is running for Jerusalem mayor on an anti-religious secularist platform, were welcomed into the same tolerant pluralistic open school.

The police came and evicted Mrs. M. from her station standing in front of the open liberal tolerant school. After all, she had been engaged in incitement to light sabbath candles. Had she been selling hashish it is doubtful any parents would have called the police or that they would have showed up (my observation, not Dahan’s).

And the liberal tolerant ultra-secularists of Jerusalem have now come full circle and are imitating the old Soviet Union by persecuting anyone suspected of perpetrating a drive-by blessing on a candle.

Reviewing Poorly

I was glad to see that Kenneth M. Pollack responded to the dastardly review of his book by Economist correspondent Max Rodenbeck in the New York Times Book Review.

Here's the outrageous money quote from the original review:
"It is even more misleading to assert that “the Arab regimes have implicitly or explicitly backed a range of terrorist groups.” Pray, which Arab governments does he mean, and which groups is he talking about?"

Alongside this wonderful indication of Rodenbeck's knowledge of the region, more than once he knocks Pollack for not knowing the area so well. Pray, Mr. Rodenbeck, which author did you think you could put down, and why are you the Middle East correspondent for anything?

Anyway, Pollack can take care of himself, and does so exquisitely in a letter in the latest Times Book Review. He asks, "Can Rodenbeck really not know that the governments of Libya, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria and the U.A.E. have provided formal and/or informal support to Hezbollah, Hamas, the P.L.O., Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Abu Nidal, Al Qaeda and the P.K.K., all of which engaged in acts of terrorism?" Truth be told, I'm not sure that's common knowledge at the Economist.

The best part is that Rodenbeck responds to the letter. Now, usually in these cases, the reviewer has a much stronger hand. He wrote the full-length review, and then he gets the last response to any criticism. This upper hand is something Commentary writers regularly take advantage of, and it is a bad sign for his argument when a writer can't.

See the Book Review for Rodenbeck's complete lame response. Here's the pertinent part on Arab terrorism: "But it surely is misleading to broadly condemn “the” 22 Arab governments for this sin."
Oh. Put.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Rabbi Yakov Horowitz Speaks

All week long my e-mail inbox and the comment threads on many of the frum blogs have been melting down with irate comments from frustrated members of our community expressing their justifiable anger at the horrible treatment my dear friend and colleague Dr. Benzion Twerski has received at the hands of askonim (activists) and kanoim (extremists). I actually think of them as baryonim (destructive fanatics; see Gittin 56a).

Reb Benzion's "sin," for which he and members of his family were subjected to verbal harassment and threats, was that he accepted an invitation from Assemblyman Dov Hikind to chair a panel of frum mental health professionals and educators who were to make recommendations to protect our children - in a Torah-appropriate manner and in consultation with leading rabbonim - from abuse and molestation in our schools and homes.

I have had the privilege of interacting with Reb Benzion many hundreds of times over the past 11 years as I've sought his guidance in dealing with the abuse cases that have come my way. I would like to inform those who do not know him that he is a genuine talmid chacham, a true chassid, and an osek b'tzarchei tzibur b'emunah (one who selflessly devotes himself to communal needs) in every sense of the word. I am proud to call him a friend and I am inspired by his devotion to the children of our community.

In a period of thirty-six hours I fielded several anguished calls from Dr. Twerski describing the pressure he was facing and the harassment his family members were undergoing as a result of his courageous efforts to make meaningful improvement in the arena of abuse and molestation. I must admit that after hearing Reb Benzion describe the threats he and his family members were receiving, I advised him to resign from the position he had assumed. I felt he virtually had no choice under the circumstances.

It is painful to note that history is repeating itself, as Reb Benzion's father, Rabbi Dr. Abraham Twerski, one of the great visionary leaders of our time and a prolific writer of more than 40 books, was the subject of death threats and required police protection a generation ago when he began writing and lecturing about spousal and child abuse in our community.

Just imagine how many abused children's lives would have been saved over the years had we collectively protected Dr. Abraham Twerski by reporting the individuals who threatened him and sent clear, unequivocal messages to our elected leaders and police officers to arrest and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

Just imagine how much of the chillul Hashem we are now suffering through in the secular press on the matter of child abuse would have been avoided had we taken his sage advice seriously and adopted reasonable, Torah-appropriate guidelines to keep our children safe.

What an olam hafuch (upside down world; see Bava Basra 10b) we have created. We sit silently by when decent, caring mental health professionals who have devoted their lives to helping Yiddishe kinder are terrorized while alleged and convicted pedophiles live peaceful lives in our communities.

I am certainly not calling for vigilante violence directed at pedophiles, but it just boggles the mind that none of the child molesters in our community have ever, to my knowledge, been subjected to anything remotely resembling the harassment directed at both Drs. Abraham and Benzion Twerski.

(And if you have any question as to whether or not there are convicted child molesters living in our community, go to http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/nsor/index.htm and do a search of the zip codes of our heimish neighborhoods. Warning: you will probably lose your lunch.)

This incident with Reb Benzion is just another sorry example of the Chinese Water Torture we have suffered through over the years as we gradually have ceded the moral high ground to the extremists who have increasingly over the past decade or two shredded the kind, beautiful, spiritual, tolerant and moderate haredi society I was raised in with their anger, intolerance, pashkevilin (unsigned and/or fraudulent kol koreis), threats, intimidation and, often, violence.

Make no mistake about it. We - the vast majority of haredi moderates who have been bullied into submission by these immoral, violent people purporting to represent Torah values - are in a struggle for the very soul of our Torah society. And thus far we have been losing this battle.Two weeks ago in these pages I published a column on the painful topic of child abuse titled "Lm'aan Hashem - What Will it Take?"

Here is a quote from that article:

"Is there any more sacred obligation than protecting the children entrusted to our care? Shame on us, for failing to treat it as such. Shame on us, for allowing ourselves to repeatedly get distracted with meaningless and often silly non-issues raised by self-appointed "askanim" that purport to pose spiritual risk to our children while our paramount communal responsibility to keep evil people from destroying the physical and spiritual lives of our children keeps getting bumped to the back burner."

To this I would add: Shame on the kanoim who harassed a wonderful member of our community like Dr. Twerski. You have the blood of future abuse victims on your hands - kids who could have been saved by the initiatives Dr. Twerski would have implemented.And shame on all of us for allowing such an olam hafuch to be perpetuated.

Your comments and thoughts would be appreciated.

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com




Wednesday, September 17, 2008

I LOVE Bernard-Henri Levy.

Listen here.

The Times's New Anti-Palin Template

Perhaps sensing that the liberal media's attack template of Sarah Palin as lightweight rube had not made a discernible difference in the campaign polling numbers - and may in fact have driven swing voters to the McCain-Palin ticket - The New York Times appeared to be trying a different tack last weekend.

In Sunday's edition the paper featured a seemingly interminable (better than 3,100 words) front-page piece, titled "Once Elected, Palin Hired Friends, Lashed Foes," by a trio of reporters designed to present Palin as a Machiavellian schemer of Nixonian proportions - a master manipulator of the tools of her office who rewards friends, punishes foes, and does it all in a cocoon of near-impenetrable secrecy.

The writers made a perfunctory early attempt at even-handedness, acknowledging in their 10th paragraph that "Ms. Palin has many supporters....In Wasilla, many residents display unflagging affection, cheering "our Sarah" and hissing at her critics," but then spent the next several dozen paragraphs painting her as a steely and determined pol with a penchant for operating under the radar.

Hardy readers who made their way (and how many did?) to the 67th paragraph of the piece finally came upon a break in the clouds, a brief acknowledgment that Palin is a highly popular governor with some impressive achievements:

"To her supporters - and with an 80 percent approval rating, she has plenty - Ms. Palin has lifted Alaska out of a mire of corruption. She gained the passage of a bill that tightens the rules covering lobbyists. And she rewrote the tax code to capture a greater share of oil and gas sale proceeds."

But, predictably, the article quickly reverted to type, complaining that the bloom is off the reformer's rose thanks to the "troopergate" scandal and accusations that she "improperly cull[ed] thousands of e-mail addresses from a state database for a mass mailing to rally support for a policy initiative."

In a spot-on dissection of the article on Commentary's Contentions blog, Jennifer Rubin wrote:

In just the first few paragraphs you have testimony that she was "effective and accessible." So where are we going here? Well, despite the testimony that she was "accessible," others find her "secretive" and inclined to put a premium on "loyalty." The evidence? The Governor's office declined a request for e-mails that would have cost over $400,000. Proof positive. Oh, and the records sought (about polar bears and such) were in fact obtained.

Then there is the "she blurs personal and public behavior" charge. The evidence? A phone call from Todd Palin to a state legislator about the latter's chief of staff, which Palin denies was mentioned. Pretty thin gruel.

Next we have her tenure as mayor, where again all heck breaks loose because - are ya sitting down? - she brought in her own team. No! Unheard of. Next she'll be firing the town museum director. Oh no- it's true! Palin says ("Oh yeah, she says," you can hear the Times reporters hrrumphing) she was cutting the budget.

This is pathetic, really. Is there something illegal here? Is there something nefarious? What is the point?

The next offense: while she was mayor city employees were told not to talk to the press. The horror! Might there have been a procedure, a public affairs or press person for that? We don't know and the Times doesn't tell us.

Then on page four of this eye-popping account, we learn as Governor she had the temerity to have "surrounded herself with people she has known since grade school and members of her church." No! She hired people she knew? And people she trusted because she had just run against a hostile machine of her own party? The Lieutenant Governor offers up that they were "competent, qualified, top-notch people," but are you going to believe him?

Rubin had more, but you get the point. The Times article was a classic case of a hit piece gone awry - the paper had designated a huge chunk of space to fill with what the editors obviously hoped would be a treasure trove of Palin's misdeeds or worse, and in the end all the writers could come up with were the typical if often jejune machinations of local government.

It's hard to see this line of attack resonating with voters who aren't already anti-Palin, but it's remarkable that after attacking her for days on end in its news pages and editorial columns as a Dan Quayle in pumps, The New York Times would now have you believe Sarah Palin is in fact a cross between G. Gordon Liddy and Dick Cheney.

Prayer for A New Age?

This bit of news showed up in my inbox this morning:

"Two of the leading gay congregations in the United States are gearing up to publish formal editions of their prayer books, marking the first time that a siddur drafted with the needs of gay and lesbian Jews in mind will be made available to a wide audience."

And as prepared as I thought I was for what that meant, my thoughts didn't come close. I expected changes that would make things less "male" sounding, which there will be.

For instance: "Siddur B'chol L'Vav'cha (“With All Your Heart”), for example, compares God's rejoicing not to a bride and groom, as in the traditional version of the Shabbat evening L'cha Dodi prayer, but to the more general 'heart [that] rejoices in love.'”

However, what I didn't expect was Al Hanissim being changed to reflect the “miraculous deliverance” of the struggle for gay equality.

And there's more, feel free to read it for yourself.

For me, I felt profound sadness. I don't know if I can put it into words, but as they say, hamayvin, yavin.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Live & Let Die


If you're wondering how the current Wall St. meltdown is playing itself out in the Holy Land here are a few fascinating morsels:

* The front-page of Tuesday's "Yisroel Hayom", Israel's largest free daily newspaper featured a black background with the headlines: "Fear of A Global Depression: Worst Day On Wall St. Since The Great Depression of 1929"

*AIG-One of the country's most popular insurance companies began to yank their highly-popular TV commercials

*The Israeli business newspaper-Globes-reported that several Israeli banks were on the verge of losing about $100 million in investments that were handled through Lehman Bros.

*The Governor of the Bank of Israel, Stanley Fischer announced that Israel's banking system was financially sound and could easily weather the Wall St. meltdown and the sub-prime crisis, which had no real impact on Israel's financial system at all during the past year.

*However, about a half-dozen large Israeli real estate companies with substantial investments in both the American and E. European marketplaces are going to have to find new sources of financial backing for various projects. Israeli real estate companies are heavily involved in commercial and residential building projects in Las Vegas, Miami, New York, Warsaw, Bucharest and Moscow. Some have begun to sell off some of their lucrative assets in Israel in order to raise cash and pay off bank debts.

*Israel's hi-tech, export and tourism sectors are expected to be impacted by the Wall St. meltdown. The Israeli economy, which had been growing at around 5% a year, will most probably drop to between 2-3% in 2009. Orders for new hi-tech and food products from American and European markets are expected to drop by at least 10% during the next 6 months, which could mean short-term layoffs in the aforementioned industries. The hotel industry, which is coming off of its best year since 2000, will be forced to offer discounted rates and spend additional monies on advertising in order to lure back existing customers and new tourists.

The good news is that many Israelis continue to live their lives to the fullest, pouring money into a variety of cultural events including the upcoming Paul McCartney concert in the heart of
Tel Aviv's Yarkon Park (similar to NYC's Central Park). Despite the threats on McCartney's life and the ever constant specter of terrorism in the Jewish State, the former lead singer of the Beatles has been giving upbeat interviews to the Israeli media. And why not? The concert is a sell-out, with the average price of a "good ticket" at $250 a person, the Israeli equivalent of 3-days pay!

Monday, September 15, 2008

Those Religious Jews Are Interesting, No?

Reading back on some of my older posts, I noticed that I sometimes become a chronicler of instances where Orthodox Judaism meets popular culture/entertainment.

So here are a couple of said observations from the weekend:

1) Feldheim advertised one of its novels (2020 Vision by Roy S. Neuberger) in The New York Times Book Review section. I don't recall ever seeing a Feldheim book advertised in NYT, or for that matter a book from any other Jewish publishing house advertised in the Times. Anyone know why Feldheim marketers were so high on 2020 Vision?

2) The current fictional serial in the NYT Magazine features a pregnant, Jewish detective who has mentioned that she "was going whole hog on the Jewish traditions. No baby shower, no fixing up the room ahead of time. Don’t want the evil eye to fasten its gaze on us." The comment to make here is that like many Jewish customs, the one to avoid planing for the baby must look very strange to the uninitiated reader, especially when mentioning the evil eye.

And here's one from a couple of weeks back:

As has been mentioned, Matisyahu has appeared in a Kenneth Cole ad wearing the designer's apparel. It's one thing to have your album in the top 40--and that's quite a thing on its own. But it's still another to be a model and introduced to millions of readers in the country. This is Orthodox Judaism meets pop culture in hyper-drive.

Prayers for Hire


An interesting e-mail showed up in my inbox this morning. It’s from Tefilot.org, and it makes the following pitch:

“Do you know someone who needs to be prayed for? Do you or someone you love need to storm the gates of Heaven to pray for health or healing, success in business, to find a spouse, for help conceiving or raising children, or for forgiveness? Any Jew who has stood at the Kotel in Jerusalem feels the power of prayer in this holy place. Those who cannot be there in person often send messages or emissaries on their behalf. For just $18 we can arrange for Rabbis and god-fearing men to pray for you on each and every day for 40 consecutive days.”

According to the website, dedicated Torah scholars agree to visit the Kotel daily to pray for others in return for financial support. The site mentions the 40 days from Rosh Chodesh Elul through Yom Kippur; it seems (though it’s not completely clear) than one can sign up for 40 days of prayer at any time, however.

Is this a brilliant marriage of entrepreneurship and spirituality? A cheesy marketing scheme with no way for customers (prayees?) to verify the activity taking place on their behalf? More to the point, can prayer be performed by proxy? Certainly, praying for others is encouraged in Judaism; we are even taught that one who prays for someone else who needs the same thing will be answered first. But this is the first time I’ve seen prayer for others (complete strangers, no less) being used as a fundraising tool.

Although the concept first struck me as tacky—and I am bothered by the selective use of men as vehicles of prayer (prayers?)—closer reflection has made me reconsider. From their bios, the two men behind the project, haredim both, seem truly altruistic. If the arrangement is carried out faithfully and sincerely, what harm can there be in having someone closer to the dwelling place of G-d deliver prayers to Him with another beneficiary in mind, the latter performing the mitzvah of tzedakah at the same time?

Of course, this beautiful synergy hinges on an “if.” One worth $18, perhaps.

Friday, September 12, 2008

This Week's Lighter Side


A great majority of what gets posted on this blog has a serious political bent to it. In the interest of keeping things interesting, once a week we'll post something more lighthearted.

From this week's issue of The Jewish Press:

Cold Meat on a Shabbos Afternoon
by Shmuel Tennenhaus

"So much has been written about the Rubashkins, specifically the allegations made against their company. AgriProcessors has been filleted by writers, roasted by bloggers, and smoked by former employees. It's not my purpose here to defend the company against those allegations; I'll let the public-relations professionals and attorneys handle that. I merely wish to share my personal experiences with Rubashkin meat.

In 1994 I was living at home, in Hallandale, Florida (a city about 30 minutes north of Miami) when it was decided I would go to a yeshiva out of town, as there were no Chabad yeshivas in the area. I informed my parents I wanted to study in a yeshiva in France because that's where my classmates in Miami were headed.

That summer, we made all the necessary preparations. Since classes at the French yeshiva were taught in Yiddish, my parents hired a tutor to teach me the basics of the language -- basically, if someone is procrastinating, say "nuuuuu?" and if a miscreant pulls into a parking spot you had your eye on, mutter "aaaach!"

Finally, it was time to depart. Swimming in my bar mitzvah black hat and wearing dark trousers with white socks, I was a real 14-year-old fashion plate that day at Miami International Airport. Spanish blared over the intercom with sporadic English announcements. I recall the pride in my father's eyes -- his eldest son was going away to yeshiva.

My mother was also shepping nachas but would have preferred a school closer to home - somewhere, say, in Canada or New York.

At the airport gate, my dad congregated with the fathers of my friends. I recall their discussing how when they went to yeshiva they had two pairs of pants, maybe three. Now their children insisted on ten pairs minimum -- some of them even cuffed!

The French yeshiva was known for its rigorous learning. It was also notorious for its less than tasty food, which, to add insult to injury, was served in such tiny portions. (There's an oft-repeated story about a founding father of the yeshiva observing his students eating bread and butter and commenting, "I understand they want to eat bread and butter. But why does the butter have to be on the bread?")

During my three-year stay, I often went to bed hungry. I survived on baguettes, which became as difficult to consume as they are to spell. Yes, I know Americans typically consider the baguette be a French delicacy. That's because they eat one every six months. Try living on it for thirty-six consecutive months, excluding Passover, without much else.

Another thing: baguettes taste best when fresh. But as time passes - a week or so in the squalor of a yeshiva kitchen usually does the trick -- the bread turns coarse, rough, and barely edible.

Things would have been much more bleak for my stomach had it not been for a small contingent of fellow students. Luckily, there were several Rubashkin boys among our ravenous group. Without fail, every Shabbos afternoon, during the day's customary third meal, the Rubashkin clan would bring out vacuum-packed rolls of smoked turkey and salami.

Their spoils were graciously shared with all the other students. In addition, some savvy American students had managed to smuggle boxes of ketchup and mustard packets into the yeshiva, which enforced a strict ban against bringing in outside food. The condiments were considered contraband; we considered them essential to our Shabbos repast.

We would take those wonderful slices of meat and a ketchup packet and create a sandwich on the always available baguette. This was the highlight of my Shabbos. The prayers were nice. A lighter study schedule was enjoyable. But those cold cuts were heaven on earth. The manna in the desert had nothing on the smoked meat the Rubashkins dispersed to the throngs of starving yeshiva students. (In fact, the wandering Jews complained to God about the manna, saying they'd prefer meat.)

Incidentally, I also had the good fortune of rooming with a Schmerling from Switzerland. His family owned the large Zurich-based cheese and chocolate company. Shmerling had an insatiable appetite for crunchy peanut butter, which for some reason was not kosher back in the Swiss Alps. I, on the other hand, hailed from the United States, where kosher peanut butter was plentiful and abundant.

On more than one occasion Shmerling and I engaged in barter: two bars of dark chocolate for one plastic jar of peanut butter, which had managed to remain intact despite traveling overseas in my duffle bag.

Schmerling also had a weakness for cucumber and mayonnaise sandwiches. Naturally, he was adamant about using a particular brand of Swiss mayonnaise - one that, I kid you not, came in a tooth paste-type tube.

Today Schmerling is a respected Chabad shaliach somewhere in Florida. For me, though, he'll always be that earnest young man meticulously applying mayonnaise from a toothpaste-type tube onto French bread.

Getting back to the Rubashkins, I realize the immense company they built from scratch is under intense criticism from certain quarters. But I confess to harboring a most favorable bias when it comes to that family - a bias based on some very generous young Rubashkins sharing some very delicious cold meat with some very hungry fellow yeshiva students on some very long Shabbos afternoons."

Shmuel (Shmuly) Tennenhaus is CEO of VanityKippah.com. He lives in Seattle, where he has developed an affinity for fish.

The Most Idiotic Jew in Congress


Ignorant Jewish Congressman of the Year?

Here is a story from the Wall Street Journal. A Jewish Congressman from Tennessee preaches about Jesus and Pontius Pilate to promote Hussein Obama:

Jews for Jesus

Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee may be learning a lesson in the dangers of mixing politics and religion, the Memphis Commercial Appeal reports:

In a brief speech, Cohen said that he believed that the political parties have differences "but if you want change, you want the Democratic Party. Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus, who our minister prayed about; Pontius Pilate was a governor."

Besides the commentary on a YouTube version of the speech making the rounds, the Tennessee Republican Party also responded with a statement.

"Frankly, we're shocked that Rep. Cohen, a Memphis Democrat who was targeted by vicious anti-Jewish slurs and bigotry during his two successful runs for Congress, would make such idiotic and offensive comments," said chairman Robin Smith.

"Comparing Gov. Palin to the killer of Christ is simply beyond the pale," she added.

"Gov. Palin's strong Christian life and faith are self-evident."

Video is here. At least Cohen didn't mention cosmetics or treif. To our mind, though, the bigger blunder consists in likening Obama to Jesus. Cohen is not a Christian, which means he does not believe Jesus is the Messiah. But most Americans do, making this a problematic comparison given that some of Obama's critics have accused him of having a messiah complex.

This moron Cohen has a web site here: http://cohen.house.gov/

Thursday, September 11, 2008

An Earnest Campaign

As the presidential campaign begins to heat up, The Jewish Press editorial board reminds our readers how important it is to know where the candidates stand on several key issues.

"Everyone seems to be seized with the Sarah Palin phenomenon as the presidential race gets going in earnest, but it is important that both campaigns be required to present their positions on the key issues. Those of us with a special interest in Israel and America's place in the world should seek clarification on several key points.

Although we have been rigorous in our focus on Senator Obama, we have tried to proceed in as nonpartisan a fashion as possible. That is, we went where the facts took us. Thus we questioned his longtime relationship with his America-bashing and Israel-hating pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

We also took issue with Sen. Obama’s comment that while he understood Israel's need for a buffer zone between itself and the Palestinians, he could not endorse Israel's retention of major West Bank population centers. We were similarly concerned about his statement that he would not necessarily support the "extreme" policies of Israeli governments even when Israel's security was involved. That's fine, but would he coerce Israel into conformity?


We also criticized Sen. Obama for his flip-flop on Jerusalem. Even accepting that any final decision on Jerusalem must be worked out between Israel and the Palestinians, would he support Israel's pursuit of a truly undivided Jerusalem as its capital? Does he believe that there is an element of legitimate "resistance" in the activities of Hamas and Hizbullah? Would he support Israel's rejection of the notion of such legitimacy?

Also with Iran. We asked whether Sen. Obama really believed that all nations must have a seat at the table to air their grievances -- or are America and Israel special with regard to their interests? And what did Sen. Obama mean when he said Hamas leaders supported his candidacy because they thought he would abandoned President Bush's "cowboy diplomacy?" Was he saying that American policy was the proximate cause of international terrorism rather than the Muslim world’s systemic jihadism? How far is Senator Obama really prepared to go to thwart Iran's world-altering nuclear ambitions?

Frankly, though we have a sense of where Senator McCain is on the above issues, we cannot be all that certain about the particulars. Perhaps his image and reputation has shielded him from intense scrutiny. Perhaps Sen. Obama drew undue attention to himself by virtue of his seeming disconnect with established policies. In any event, the stakes are high. We will leave it to others to press the candidates on the economy and the environment. But with respect to the Middle East and America's role in the world, we all have an obligation to satisfy ourselves as to who should lead the free world beginning January 20, 2009."

To comment or voice your opinion, click here

This Week @ www.jewishpress.com




Eureka! I Solved Israel's Political Crisis!


You see, all we have to do is send Ehud Olmert to Dothan, Alabama.

Associated Press reports that $50,000 is being offered to Jews who come to Dothan, Alabama and settle there. Olmert can take a payoff and use it for a new house without facing any new prosecution!

Not only that but at last there will be a Dothan that Olmert is not trying to hand over to the Palestinian savages!

And being the peanut capital of the south, he can host Jimmy Carter to ribs. In photo on right, see Carter visiting the town.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Current Events Analogies



Apologies, but could not resist. First, Academic Jihadnik Juan Cole from the University of Michigan compares Sarah Palin to an Islamic fundamentalist in:
"What's the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists?
A theocrat is a theocrat, whether Muslim or Christian"
By Juan Cole
Sep. 09, 2008


So Then:
What is the difference between Juan Cole and a craven anti-Israel
academic prostitute for Norman Finkelstein? Answer: the Lipstick er I
mean Lustick.

(Ian Lustick, University of Pennsylvania – see this )

Monday, September 8, 2008

Poster People

Right now my neighborhood is being flooded. No, not by Ike, but by a fierce political storm: Campaign signs and posters are everywhere, and brochure-bearing volunteers out in force in preparation for Primary Day tomorrow.

Aside from the obvious question—where do they get the money to print all this stuff?—I wonder: Does it work? How many people decide whom to vote for based on which names they most recall seeing plastered around? Even more to the point, how many of those who would not otherwise be inclined to vote decide to go to the polls because of these cardboard appeals?

I hope not too many. It’s one thing to consult a newspaper (say, the Jewish Press) for an informed opinion about whom to vote for, or to follow the endorsement of some other trusted source. But to vote based on name recognition or an engaging leaflet is foolish—and possibly worse than not voting at all. One could unwittingly help elect a candidate whose agenda he or she would find anathema.

It’s our civic responsibility to vote, and taking that seriously means finding out a thing or two about the candidates, and being as wary of the political paper storm as we try to be of ads for low-fat donuts and super-discount travel deals.

In consumer advertising, branding works: If you get your name into people’s heads, it will be there when they stand in the supermarket aisle deciding which toothpaste to buy. Still, if they don’t like the toothpaste they choose, they can throw it out whenever they like. Not so a candidate installed into office with the clout to affect the policies of the polis for at least a two-year term.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

When Will We Start Protecting Our Children?

It is difficult to describe the sickening, gut-wrenching sensation I experience when I get phone calls from parents whose children were sexually abused or from adults who have carried the horrible scars of childhood abuse for decades, often shredding their relationships and ruining their lives. And, I am sad to report that those calls are getting more frequent as time goes on.

L'maan Hashem - what will it take for us to take this issue seriously? How many more indictments of frum pedophiles will it take for us to cut through the denial and deal with the fact that we have a real problem? Not a Jewish problem, but a human one. (As I've written in the past, abuse and molestation are issues that all communities face. It only becomes a Jewish problem when we choose to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it.) How many more suicides or drug overdoses do we need to endure before we will start understanding that this is one of the pressing challenges that we need to squarely face? And, in my opinion, sexual abuse is by far the leading cause of high-end drug use and ruined lives of the teens in our community.

The saddest thing of all is that the steps that need to be taken to prevent today's innocent children from future abuse are not terribly complicated. From my vantage point; all it takes is to:

1. Raise the awareness level by having community leaders write and speak about this issue in a forthright and unequivocal manner.
2. Teach our parents and educators how to speak to their children about personal privacy. And this can be easily done in a modest, Torah-appropriate manner.
3. Develop the righteous indignation to finally protect our children by sending a clear message that those who molest them will be treated like the rodfim and murderers they are - reported to the authorities, arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

To read more of Rabbi Horowitz's article click here:

Israel Needs Rudy


During my two plus years as a volunteer policeman in Modiin, I discovered that the Israel Police force is rife with low-quality professionals who more often than not are busy covering-up their own mishaps, rather than truly fighting crime and terrorism. The painfully slow reaction time to the recent wave of terror attacks in Jerusalem by the local "Police Squads" reinforces my assertions. In fact, if it weren't for the "chesed" of those who partake in volunteer police patrols, cities like Modiin would basically be left without any semblance of security.

Now comes word from Israel's Minister of Internal Security, Avi Dichter, that a growing number of policemen who leave the force are actually providing vital intelligence to, and in some cases, actually joining criminal organizations. There is a direct correlation between the growing violence in Israel and the spike in criminal underworld activities. The fact that police have actually relied upon the FBI to extradite and prosecute Israeli mafia chieftains proves that the Israeli police cannot do the job in their own backyard.

This is a frightening revelation that is every bit as dangerous to Israeli society as the threat from Islamic terrorism. When gangsters are allowed to do whatever they please, including murdering innocent people on the beaches and streets of Israel without fear, then it's time to pick-up the phone to the one man who can put an end to the "Jewish gangster" madness---RUDY GIULIANI.

Rudy is the only one who would know how to combat the Israeli mafia (you think he doesn't know about the Hebrew-speaking 'chevra' from his days as a prosecutor and mayor?) and
purge the "bad cops" from the force.

There have been rumors over the years that certain Israeli politicians would be willing to bring Rudy over for a few months in order to "consult" on combating both the gangsters and crooked cops.

With elections an almost foregone conclusion within the next 6-9 months, Likud leader
Benjamin Netanyahu could virtually guarantee his re-election as Prime Minister if he would publicly announce that he's bringing Rudy over as part of a "law and order" taskforce.

With or without Bibi, if Israel doesn't draft someone like a Rudy Giuliani to the cause real soon, the Israel Police will implode under the weight of their incompetency. A truly scary scenario that is playing itself out on the streets of Israel at this very moment.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

The Jewish Press Primary Endorsements

Manhattan Surrogate’s Court
The Jewish Press endorses John Reddy for Manhattan Surrogate. Reddy has been counsel to the Public Administrator of Manhattan since 1995 and is one of the country’s foremost and most respected specialists in surrogate’s court work. A recognized authority in the fi eld who has published many articles in professional journals on the work of the surrogate’s court, he also has a long record of protecting the interests of charities when individuals have attempted to exert undue infl uence over members of our elderly community. Through his efforts, Hatzolah of Washington Heights obtained a new ambulance over the objections of an estate executor, and countless Jewish charities have benefi ted from his sensitivity and expertise. Mr. Reddy’s principal opponent, Nora Anderson, is an able and experienced practitioner in the surrogate’s court and brings much to the table. However, Mr. Reddy’s towering stature in the estates fi eld and his more than two decades-long sensitivity to Jewish charities make him our choice.

NYS Assembly
Sheldon Silver, 64th AD (D-Lower Manhattan)
Last week in our lead editorial we urged voters in lower Manhattan to vote for Sheldon Silver
on Sept. 9. As we noted, he has admirably served his local constituents and in terms of the needs of the Jewish community he has been an extraordinary resource.

Phil Ramos, 6th AD (D-Suffolk County)
Assemblyman Phil Ramos was elected to the Assembly in 2002 and has fought hard for state aid to education for local schools and championed the effort to ensure every child in the state has access to health care coverage.

Ellen Young, 22AD (D-Queens)
Assemblywoman Ellen Young was fi rst elected to the New York State Assembly in 2005. She has a distinguished career in public service and understands the importance of education, healthcare and the need to protect services for seniors.

Rhoda Jacobs, 42nd AD (D-Midwood)
Rhoda Jacobs has been a member of the Assembly since 1978 and has been at the forefront of issues relating to health care, Medicaid, job development, immigrant issues, consumer education and protection in banking, insurance and public utilities. Her cutting edge legislation has served as a national model for preventive measures in women’s and children’s health care and she has been a vigorous advocate on issues important to the Jewish community.

To read more endorsements, including our choices for NYS Senate, click here: